SECTION 3.0
THE CONODOGUINET WATERSHED
3.4 Review And Assessment of Existing Data, continued
Synthesis of Watershed 135 Archaeological Data
In the past, various researchers have attempted to synthesize the Conodoguinet watershed archaeological data in order to develop predictive models to facilitate and/or obviate ground-testing (e.g., Berge and Lewis 1993; Hay et al. 1986; Stewart 1979). These researchers have met with variable--though usually limited--success, in part due to the quality of the data as described above. Despite the problems encountered by these early efforts, we feel it necessary to bring together the Conodoguinet data using the framework of a predictive model so that we can better understand: (1) the questions that might be answered by the existing data; (2) the questions that cannot be answered by the existing data; (3) the physical areas where we should be looking for answers.
The modeling protocol used in this study was designed by the senior author for application to CRM projects in the Pocono Uplands of eastern Pennsylvania and has had some success in predicting areas of relatively higher and lower site potential (Atchison et al. 1996; Mooney et al. 2000; Perazio 1994, 1996, 1998; Rinehart and Perazio 2000). More recently, it has been applied on a limited basis to upland settings outside the Poconos (Rinehart et al. 2000). The Pocono model recognizes the importance of a number of variables in site selection and preservation. These factors are: topography, slope, aspect, distance (both horizontal and vertical) to fresh water sources, distance to stream confluences, soil drainage, and soil productivity. While the earlier Conodoguinet models employed a number of these factors, ours is the first to integrate all of them into a single synthesis. Each of the variables is discussed below as it pertains to site distribution in Watershed 135.
An additional point should be made regarding this modeling approach to evaluating the Conodoguinet database. The Pocono upland sample consisted of 97 Archaic Period sites (Perazio 1994). As will be discussed below, the Conodoguinet upland database contains a total of only 70 recorded sites, including dated sites of all prehistoric periods and undated prehistoric sites. The weak or non-existent patterning for most variables in the Conodoguinet data (see below), as opposed to the relatively clear trends in the Pocono data, is likely in part the result of small sample sizes. As will be discussed more fully below, only by increasing the number of dated sites can we hope to develop the kind of database that can be used to address important research questions.
Upland versus Riverine Settings
Riverine landforms are beaches, floodplains, rises in floodplains, terraces, and islands (Topographic Codes 1-4, 14). They are differentiated from upland landforms like lower slopes, middle slopes, upper slopes, stream benches, hill ridges/toes, upland flats, hilltops, ridgetops, saddles, and hillslopes (Topographic Codes 5-13, 15). Rockshelters / reentrants represent a special class of site not given a topographic code and not considered in questions of upland versus riverine setting (BHP 1996:21). The data are presented in Table 3. Excluding the four unclassified sites, the totals are 70 (62.5%) in the uplands and 42 (37.5%) in riverine settings.
Chronology
The prehistoric chronology of the Conodoguinet watershed can only be constructed, at present, on the basis of very little hard data. Only 31.4 percent of the upland sites, 38.1 percent of the riverine sites, and 50.0 percent of the special / unclassified sites have diagnostics listed in the database (Table 5). The percentages of reliable data are far lower. The sources of dates ascribed to the other sites in the drainage remain unknown or unsupported. For example, one site was ascribed to the Terminal / Transitional Archaic based on the recovery of three rhyolite flakes from the site and "the preponderate (sic.) use of rhyolite as the raw material for projectile point manufacture during" that period (Hay et al. 1986:5-1). This hardly represents a sound basis for chronological ascription, particularly given the proximity of the South Mountain rhyolite quarries (as described above). Determining the chronology of sites listed in the PASS database presents a number of difficulties. At first glance, it appears that most of the sites listed in the database are multicomponent sites. While this may be true for some, it is certainly not the case for others. In these cases, several component codes are entered for single diagnostic artifacts with broad time ranges. For example, a site that produced a single Steubenville / Fox Creek point might be listed with Late Archaic, Transitional / Terminal Archaic, and Early Woodland components. In this manner, a single artifact seems to indicate three separate occupations. We had no way of overcoming this situation and had to calculate from the data as they exist recognizing this limitation.
Table 5: List of Diagnostic Artifacts Recovered by Site
| Site Number | Components Listed | Diagnostics Recovered |
|
Upland Sites |
||
| 36CU10 | Paleoindian, Late Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU12 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU13 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU15 | Early Archaic | Kirk |
| 36CU16 | Undefined Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU17 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU26 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU101 | Late Woodland | Clemsons Island / Princess Point Series Ceramics
Lancaster Incised Ceramics Late Woodland Triangles |
| 36CU106 | Late Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU108 | Late Archaic Terminal / Transitional Archaic Early Woodland, Late Woodland |
Broadspears |
| 36CU110 | Late Archaic, Middle Woodland | Jacks Reef Laurentian Tradition |
| 36CU111 | Middle Woodland | Jacks Reef Steubenville / Fox Creek |
| 36CU115 | Middle Archaic | Bifurcate Points |
| 36CU145 | Late Archaic | Late Archaic |
| 36CU160 | Middle Archaic, Late Archaic Terminal / Transitional Archaic Late Woodland |
Archaic |
| 36FR7 | Late Archaic Terminal / Transitional Archaic |
Orient |
| 36FR9 | Late ArchaicTerminal / Transitional Archaic | Broadspears Koens Crispins / Savannah River |
| 36FR18 | Late Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36FR19 | Late Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36FR20 | Late Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36FR113 | Late Archaic | Laurentian Tradition |
| 36FR196 | Undefined Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
|
Riverine Sites |
||
| 36CU3 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU4 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU9 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU23 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU30 | Middle Archaic, Late Archaic,Middle Woodland | Jacks Reef Notched / Stemmed Points Piedmont Tradition |
| 36CU44 | Middle Archaic | Bifurcate Points |
| 36CU47 | Early Woodland | Adena (Stemmed) |
| 36CU83 | Late Archaic | Piedmont Tradition |
| 36CU85 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU102 | Late Archaic Terminal / Transitional Archaic Early Woodland, Late Woodland |
Steubenville / Fox Creek |
| 36CU103 | Late Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU104 | Late Archaic, Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36CU112 | Paleoindian, Undefined Archaic Late Woodland |
Adena (Stemmed) Clovis Meadowwood Potomac Creek Cord-Impressed Ceramics Triangles |
| 36CU113 | Middle Woodland | Jacks Reef |
| 36CU114 | Late Woodland | Triangles |
| 36FR69 | Paleoindian | Clovis |
|
Special / Unclassified Sites |
||
| 36CU1 | Middle Archaic, Late Archaic Terminal / Transitional Archaic |
Bifurcate Points Broadspears Piedmont Tradition Susquehanna Wyoming Valley Complex |
| 36CU25 | Early Archaic | Kirk |
It is clear from the data that every major prehistoric cultural period is represented in the Conodoguinet sample (Table 6). Each subperiod of the Archaic and Woodland periods is also represented. As should be clear from Table 6, the number of sites representing some of these components is exceedingly small (85 datable components out of a total of 116 sites). Given this state of affairs, the percentage value of a single site within its period (used to somewhat standardize site numbers for the analyses described below) is highly variable. While a single site during the Early Archaic period (n =2) represents 50 percent of that period's sample, during the Late Archaic (n = 30) a single site represents 3.3 percent of the sample. This caveat should be kept in mind in reviewing any apparent trends in the data through time.
In reviewing the Watershed 135 chronology, it must be remembered that the dating of most of the sites is questionable. Not only is there the problem of multiple components from single artifacts (as described above), there is what might be called "wishful dating". Only five upland sites list a basis for chronological ascription in the "CBASIS" field of the PASS database; one lists the PASS form (without describing the submitters' basis for ascription). For the remainder of these sites (n=4), lithics are listed as the basis for ascription. The same number of riverine sites (n = 5) have data in this field. All of these sites list lithics as the basis. Two of the special / unclassified sites list a basis for chronology: one lithics and the other, a PASS form. None of the sites lists ceramics, though they are present in a few Conodoguinet collections (Table 5; see below). None of the sites lists radiocarbon dates and our review of site reports did not indicate that such dating had been attempted on sites in the drainage.
Twenty-two upland sites have diagnostic material listed in the PASS database (Table 5). For a few of these sites (e.g., 36CU111, 36FR113), the recovered material supports the ascription of the site to various components. For others, there aren't enough diagnostics to support the supposed chronology in the absence of radiometric dates. Site 36CU10--which lists a Paleoindian, a Late Archaic, and a Late Woodland component on the basis of Triangular points (see below)--is an example of this problem. A few of these sites only relist the identified component in the diagnostic field (e.g., 36CU145), failing to describe recovered artifacts. Questionable data of this nature also exist for the sixteen riverine sites listing diagnostics.
Another caveat with regard to the Conodoguinet chronology involves the Late Woodland period. Most of the sites ascribed to this period have been so placed because of the presence of Triangular point forms. The problems of this temporal ascription have be enumerated by a number of authors in recent years (e.g., Custer 1996), and the number of Late Woodland components in the drainage might be far lower than the 27 listed in Table 6. Half (11/22) of dated, upland sites have their chronological ascription based solely on the presence of Triangular points. The BHP notes this problem but fails to indicate how it might be overcome. Ceramics might help in the identification and/or verification of Woodland components, but the probability of their initial presence and long-term preservation (particularly on shallow upland sites) is very low. Prehistoric ceramics are only listed from two of the Watershed 135 sites.
Table 6: Chronology of Sites in Watershed 135 by Setting
| Site Number | Unknown Prehistoric | Paleoindian | Archaic | Woodland | Total | ||||||
| E | M | L | Terminal | Undefined | E | M | L | ||||
|
Upland Sites |
|||||||||||
| 36CU10 | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 3 |
| 36CU11 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU12 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU13 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU15 | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU16 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36CU17 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU19 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU22 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU26 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU27 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU43 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU46 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU48 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU50 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU51 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU84 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU98 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU100 | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU101 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU106 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36CU108 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | -- | 1 | -- | 1 | 4 |
| 36CU109 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU110 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | 2 |
| 36CU111 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | 1 |
| 36CU115 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU116 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU118 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU122 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU123 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU124 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU145 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU160 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 4 |
| 36FR2 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR3 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR4 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR5 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR6 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR7 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2 |
| 36FR8 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 2 |
| 36FR9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 2 |
| 36FR10 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR11 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR17 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR18 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36FR19 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36FR20 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36FR22 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR23 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR24 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR25 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR26 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR27 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR28 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR29 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR30 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR45 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36FR46 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 36FR52 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR53 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR54 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR55 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR56 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR57 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR58 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR59 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR60 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR113 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR114 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2 |
| 36FR196 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
|
Total
|
33 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 91 |
|
Riverine Sites |
|||||||||||
| 36CU3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU5 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU6 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU7 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU8 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU9 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU14 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU18 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU20 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU21 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU23 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU24 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU28 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU29 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU30 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | 3 |
| 36CU31 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU44 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU45 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU47 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU78 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU81 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU82 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU83 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU85 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU86 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU87 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU90 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU102 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | -- | 1 | -- | 1 | 4 |
| 36CU103 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36CU104 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 2 |
| 36CU105 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU112 | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | 1 | 3 |
| 36CU113 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | 1 |
| 36CU114 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 |
| 36CU117 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU119 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU120 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU121 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR21 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36FR47 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 36FR69 | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
|
Total
|
22 | 2 | -- | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 52 |
|
Special / Unclassified Sites |
|||||||||||
| 36CU1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3 |
| 36CU25 | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU49 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| 36CU144 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
|
Total
|
1 | -- | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | 6 |
|
Total Sites |
56 |
4 | 2 | 6 | 30 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 27 | 149 |
|
Percent * |
- | 4.7 | 2.4 | 7.1 | 35.3 | 7.1 | - | 4.7 | 7.1 | 31.8 | 100.2 |
* N=85, excluding Unknown Prehistoric and Unidentified Archaic.
Attempting to see past the misgivings noted above, it is possible to make a few general statements about site settings through time. Unascribable prehistoric remains are common in both upland and riverine settings in Watershed 135. Such remains also characterize a site in the special or unclassified settings (Table 6). The four Paleoindian sites in the drainage are evenly distributed between upland and riverine settings. Slightly more Archaic sites are located in riverine settings than upland settings, l / unclassified settings. Of note during the Archaic is the occurrence of a high number of "Undefined" Archaic remains in the upland zone. These remains seem to represent the typical "lithic scatter" that the BHP feels are adequately represented in the exempted watersheds. The distribution of sites in the following Woodland period shifts progressively river-ward. By the Late Woodland, 70.4 percent of the sites are located in riverine settings (Table 7).
Table 7: Distribution of Sites in Watershed by Landform and Known Component
| Landform | Number of Sites | Paleoindian | Archaic | Woodland | ||||||
| E | M | L | Terminal | Undefined | E | M | L | |||
|
Upland Sites |
||||||||||
| Hill Ridge / Toe | 2 | -- | -- | 2 | 1 | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 |
| Percent(a) | 1.7 | -- | -- | 33 | 3.3 | 16.7 | -- | -- | -- | 3.7 |
| Hillslope | 1 | -- | -- | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
Percent(a) |
0.9 |
-- | -- | -- | 3.3 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Hill Top | 4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 2 | -- | -- | 3 |
| Percent(a) | 3.4 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | 25 | -- | -- | 11 |
| Ridgetop | 1 | -- | 1 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Percent(a) | 0.9 | -- | 50 | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Stream Bench | 50 | 1 | -- | 1 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Percent(a) | 43.1 | 25 | -- | 17 | 50 | 16.7 | 37.5 | 25 | 17 | 41 |
| Upland Flat | 12 | 1 | -- | -- | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Percent(a) | 10.3 | 25 | -- | -- | 10 | 33.3 | 25 | 25 | 33 | 3.7 |
| Subtotal (n) | 70 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 16 |
| Riverine Sites | ||||||||||
| Floodplain | 17 | 2 | -- | -- | 3 | -- | 1 | -- | 1 | 4 |
|
Percent(a) |
14.7 |
50 |
-- | -- | 10 | -- | 12.5 | -- | 17 | 15 |
| Terrace | 25 | -- | -- | 2 | 5 | 1 | -- | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Percent(a) | 21.6 | -- | -- | 33 | 17 | |||||